Lucien Cartier-Tilet
a683810bdc
Initialize project documentation structure: - Add CLAUDE.md with development guidelines and architecture principles - Add project constitution (v1.1.0) with hexagonal architecture and SOLID principles - Add MCP server configuration for Context7 integration Feature specification (001-modbus-relay-control): - Complete feature spec for web-based Modbus relay control system - Implementation plan with TDD approach using SQLx for persistence - Type-driven development design for domain types - Technical decisions document (SQLx over rusqlite, SQLite persistence) - Detailed task breakdown (94 tasks across 8 phases) - Specification templates for future features Documentation: - Modbus POE ETH Relay hardware documentation - Modbus Application Protocol specification (PDF) Project uses SQLx for compile-time verified SQL queries, aligned with type-driven development principles.
52 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
52 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Modbus Relay Control System
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2025-12-28
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](./spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- **Note**: Specification intentionally includes some implementation constraints (Rust, Poem, tokio-modbus) per project constitution requirements (NFR-009, NFR-014, NFR-015). These are architectural constraints, not implementation details of business logic.
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- **Resolution**: FR-023 clarified by user - backend starts successfully even when device unhealthy, frontend displays error as part of Health story
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- **Note**: SC-010 references cargo tarpaulin as measurement tool, which is acceptable for NFR validation
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Quality Assessment
|
|
|
|
**Overall Status**: ✅ **READY FOR PLANNING**
|
|
|
|
### Strengths
|
|
- Comprehensive coverage of 5 prioritized, independently testable user stories
|
|
- 37 functional + 21 non-functional requirements provide clear scope
|
|
- Edge cases thoroughly documented with specific mitigation strategies
|
|
- Success criteria are measurable and aligned with user stories
|
|
- Clear boundaries with explicit "Out of Scope" section
|
|
- Risk matrix identifies key concerns with mitigation approaches
|
|
|
|
### Notes
|
|
- Specification includes architectural constraints (hexagonal architecture, TDD, TyDD) per project constitution
|
|
- These constraints are non-negotiable project requirements, not arbitrary implementation details
|
|
- User clarification resolved FR-023 regarding startup behavior when device is unhealthy
|
|
- Specification ready for `/sdd:02-plan` stage
|