conlang.phundrak.com/docs/eittlandic/typology.org

80 lines
2.7 KiB
Org Mode
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

#+setupfile: ../headers
* Typological Outline of the Eittlandic Language
# - Is the language dominantly isolating or polysynthetic?
# - If the language is at all polysynthetic, is it dominantly
# agglutinative or fusional? Give examples of its dominant pattern
# and any secondary patterns.
# - If the language is at all agglutinative, is it dominantly
# prefixing, suffixing or neither?
# - Illustrate the major and secondary patterns (including infixation,
# stem modification, reduplication, suprasegmental modification, and
# suppletion).
# - If the language is at all polysynthetic, is it dominantly
# "head-marking", "dependent-marking", or mixed?
# - Give some examples of each type of marking the language exhibits.
Over the last centuries, Eittlandic evolved to become a language
leaning more and more towards an analytic language, losing its
fusional aspect Old Eittlandic once had. Its grammar now greatly relies
on its syntax as well as on grammatical particules rather than on its
morphology. Lets take the following sentence as an example.
- Barn etar fisk
barn et-ar fisk
child.nom eat-3sg fish.acc
A child is eating a fish
In this sentence, the word order helps us understand the child is the
subject of the sentence while its subject is /fisk/, although we have no
information on their number; the sentence could also very well mean
/children are eating fishes/. Unlike in Old Eittlandic where we could
have the following sentences.
- Barn etar fiska
barn et-ar fiska
child.nom eat-3sg fish-pl.acc
A child is eating fishes
- Fiska etar barn
fisk-a et-ar barn
fish-pl.acc eat-3sg child.nom
A child is eating fishes
Both have the same meaning as the Eittlandic sentence. However, the
near-complete (or even complete in Standard Eittlandic) loss of case
marking makes the sentence /fisk barn etar/ much more gruesome.
- Fisk etar barn
fisk et-ar barn
fish.nom eat-3sg barn.acc
A fish is eating a child
Eittlandic is a V-2 language, meaning in most cases, finite verbs are
in second position in their clause and may be in first position
interrogative clauses and dependent clauses, as shown below.
- Han talð mér þat kom han hér í gær
han talð mér þat kom han hér í=gær
3sg.m.nom tell-3sg.pret 1sg.dat that come.3sg.pret 3sg.m.nom here yesterday
He told me he came here yesterday
Loss of case marking also affected adjectives which share most of
their declensions with nouns. The parts where Eittlandic retains its
fusional aspect is with verbs, where loss of its words final vowel
had much less impact, as we could see in /barn fisk etar/. In this case,
/etar/ is the third-person singular declension of the verb /et/, a weak
verb.