Lucien Cartier-Tilet
a683810bdc
Initialize project documentation structure: - Add CLAUDE.md with development guidelines and architecture principles - Add project constitution (v1.1.0) with hexagonal architecture and SOLID principles - Add MCP server configuration for Context7 integration Feature specification (001-modbus-relay-control): - Complete feature spec for web-based Modbus relay control system - Implementation plan with TDD approach using SQLx for persistence - Type-driven development design for domain types - Technical decisions document (SQLx over rusqlite, SQLite persistence) - Detailed task breakdown (94 tasks across 8 phases) - Specification templates for future features Documentation: - Modbus POE ETH Relay hardware documentation - Modbus Application Protocol specification (PDF) Project uses SQLx for compile-time verified SQL queries, aligned with type-driven development principles.
2.4 KiB
2.4 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Modbus Relay Control System
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2025-12-28 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Note: Specification intentionally includes some implementation constraints (Rust, Poem, tokio-modbus) per project constitution requirements (NFR-009, NFR-014, NFR-015). These are architectural constraints, not implementation details of business logic.
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Resolution: FR-023 clarified by user - backend starts successfully even when device unhealthy, frontend displays error as part of Health story
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- Note: SC-010 references cargo tarpaulin as measurement tool, which is acceptable for NFR validation
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Quality Assessment
Overall Status: ✅ READY FOR PLANNING
Strengths
- Comprehensive coverage of 5 prioritized, independently testable user stories
- 37 functional + 21 non-functional requirements provide clear scope
- Edge cases thoroughly documented with specific mitigation strategies
- Success criteria are measurable and aligned with user stories
- Clear boundaries with explicit "Out of Scope" section
- Risk matrix identifies key concerns with mitigation approaches
Notes
- Specification includes architectural constraints (hexagonal architecture, TDD, TyDD) per project constitution
- These constraints are non-negotiable project requirements, not arbitrary implementation details
- User clarification resolved FR-023 regarding startup behavior when device is unhealthy
- Specification ready for
/sdd:02-planstage