phundrak/langue-phundrak-com
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

[Proto-Ñyqy] Begin English translation

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lucien Cartier-Tilet 2021-07-19 16:38:24 +02:00
parent 0636e0ded8
commit 69b29e19fb
Signed by: phundrak
GPG Key ID: BD7789E705CB8DCA
3 changed files with 443 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

440
content/en/proto-nyqy.org Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,440 @@
# -*- eval: (require 'org-ref) -*-
#+title: The Proto-Ñyqy People
#+subtitle: Their Culture, their Language, and what we know about it
#+setupfile: ../headers
#+html_head: <meta name="description" content="The Culture and the Language of the Proto-Ñyqy people" />
#+html_head: <meta property="og:title" content="The Proto-Ñyqy people" />
#+html_head: <meta property="og:description" content="The Culture and the Language of the Proto-Ñyqy People" />
#+macro: nyqy (eval (conlanging-proto-nyqy-to-org $1))
#+options: auto-id:t
#+subject: Proto-Ñyqy Culture and Language
#+uid: https://langue.phundrak.com/en/proto-nyqy
#+latex_header: \linespread{1.15}
#+latex_header: \makeglossaries
#+latex: \printglossaries
* Foreword
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Introduction-Foreword-d22hjv20e5j0
:END:
Redistribution or sell of this document is strictly prohibited. This
document is protected by French law on copyright and is completely
owned by its author[fn:3] (myself, Lucien “Phundrak” Cartier-Tilet).
This document is released for free in various formats on the author’s
website[fn:1] and is released under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence[fn:2].
If you got this document by any other mean than a website on the
~.phundrak.com~ domain, please report it as soon as possible. There is
currently no agreement with the author to redistribute it by any mean
possible. If you wish to redistribute it, please contact the author.
This document is about a gls:conlang I created. However, it will be
written as an in-universe document would be. Therefore, any reference
to other works, documents or people will be completely fictional. If
there is somewhere written that there “needs to be more research done
on the subject” or any similar kind of expression, this simply means I
haven’t written anything on this subject, and I may not plan to. As
you might notice, the style of writing in this document will be
inspired mainly by the book /Indo-European Language and Culture/ by
Benjamin W. Forston. Go read this book if you haven’t already, it’s
extremely interesting (except for the part with the Old Irish and
Vedic people and what their kings and queens did with horses, I wish
to unread that).
This is a work of fiction. Any resemblance to persons living or dead,
to any real event, or any real people is purely coincidental.
* Introduction
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Introduction-z8wgna40e5j0
:END:
** Language Evolution
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Introduction-Language-evolution-mpo10x50e5j0
:END:
We are not sure which was the first language ever spoken in our world.
Was there even one primordial language, or were there several that
spontaneously appeared around our world here and there? We cannot know
for certain, this is too far back in our history. Some scientists
estimate the firsts of our kind to be gifted the ability to speak
lived some hundred of thousand of years back, maybe twice this period
even. There is absolutely no way to know what happened at that time
with non-physical activities, and we can only guess. We can better
guess how they lived, and how they died, than how they interacted with
each other, what was their social interaction like, and what were the
first words ever spoken on our planet. Maybe they began as grunts of
different pitches, with hand gestures, then two vowels became
distinct, a couple of consonants, and the first languages sprung from
that. This, we do not know, and this is not the subject of this book
anyways.
What we do know is, languages evolve as time passes. One language can
morph in the way it is pronounced, in the way some words are used, in
the way they are shaped by their position and role in the sentence, by
how they are organized with each other. A language spoken two
centuries back will sound like its decendent today, but with a
noticeable difference. Jumping a couple of centuries back, and we lost
some intelligibility, and some sentences sound alien to us. A
millenium back, and while the language resonates, we cannot understand
it anymore. Going the other way around, travelling to the future,
would have the same effect, except that we would not necessarily
follow only one language, but several, for in different places,
different changes would take place. As time goes by, these differences
become more and more proeminent, and what was once the same langage
becomes several dialects that become less and less similar to one
another, until we end up with several languages, sister between
themselves, daughters to the initial language.
** Relating Languages Between Themselves
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Introduction-Relating-languages-between-themselves-7qp10x50e5j0
:END:
We are not sure who first emited the theory of language evolution;
this has been lost to time during the great collapse two thousand
years back, and only a fraction of the knowledge from back then
survived the flow of time. We’re lucky even to know about this. It’s
the Professor Loqbrekh who, in 3489, first deciphered some books that
were found two decades prior, written in Énanonn. They described the
principle of language evolution, and how language families could be
reconstructed, how we could know languages are related, and a hint on
how mother languages we do not know could be reconstructed. The
principle on how historical linguistics are the following:
#+begin_quote
If two languages share a great number of coincidentally similar
features, especially in their grammar, so much so that it cannot be
explained by chance only, then these two languages are surely related.
#+end_quote
By this process, we can recreate family trees of languages. Some are
more closely related to one another than some other, which are more
distant. Sometimes, it is even unsure if a language is related to a
language tree; maybe the language simply borrowed a good amount of
vocabulary from another language that we either now of, or died since.
The best attested languages are the ones we have written record of. In
a sense, we are lucky: while we do know a vast majority of the written
documents prior to the great collapse were lost during this sad event,
we still have a good amount of them left in various languages we can
analyze, and we still find some that were lost before then and found
back again. The earliest written record we ever found was from the
Loho language, the oldest member of the Mojhal language tree attested;
the Mojhal tree has been itself linked to the Ñyqy tree some fifty
years ago by the Pr Khorlan (3598).
** Principles of Historical Linguistics
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Introduction-Principles-of-historical-linguistics-woq10x50e5j0
:END:
So, how does historical linguistics work? How does one know what the
mother language of a bunch of other languages is? In historical
linguistics, we study the similarities between languages and their
features. If a feature is obviously common, there is a good chance it
is inherited from a common ancestor. The same goes for words, we
generally take the average of several words, we estimate what their
ancestor word was like, and we estimate what sound change made these
words evolve the way they did. If this sound change consistently works
almost always, we know we hit right: sound changes are very regular,
and exceptions are very rare. And this is how we can reconstruct a
mother language that was lost to time thanks to its existing daughter
languages.
But as we go back in time, it becomes harder and harder to get
reliable data. Through evolution, some information is lost --- maybe
there once was an inflectional system that was lost in all daughter
languages, and reconstructing that is nigh impossible. And since no
reconstruction can be attested, we need a way to distinguish these
from attested forms of words. This is why attested words are simply
written like “this”, while reconstructed words are written with a
preceding star like “{{{recon(this)}}}”. Sometimes, to distinguish both from
the text, you will see the word of interest be written either in *bold*
or /italics/. This bears no difference in meaning.
** On Proto-Languages
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Introduction-On-proto-languages-qtr10x50e5j0
:END:
As we go back in time, there is a point at which we have to stop: we
no longer find any related language to our current family, or we can’t
find enough evidence that one of them is part of the family and if
they are related, they are very distantly related. This language we
cannot go beyond is called a proto-language, and it is the mother
language of the current language family tree. In our case, the
Proto-Ñyqy language, spoken by the Ñyqy people, is the mother language
of the Ñyqy language family tree and the ancestor of the more widely
known Mojhal languages.
There is something I want to insist on very clearly: a proto-language
is not a “prototype” language as we might think at first --- it is not
an imperfect, inferior language that still needs some iterations
before becoming a full-fledged language. It has been proven multiple
times multiple times around the world, despite the best efforts of the
researchers of a certain empire, that all languages are equally
complex regardless of ethnicity, education, time, and place. Languages
that are often described as “primitive” are either called so as a way
to indicate they are ancient, and therefore close to a proto-language,
or they are described so by people trying to belittle people based on
incorrect belief that some ethnicities are somehow greater or better
than others. This as well has been proven multiple times that this is
not true. A proto-language bore as much complexity as any of the
languages currently spoken around the world, and a primitive language
in linguistic terms is a language close in time to these
proto-languages, such as the Proto-Mojhal language (which is also in
turn the proto-language of the Mojhal tree). The only reason these
languages might seem simpler is because we do not know them and cannot
know them in their entierty, so of course some features are missing
from it, but they were surely there.
Note that “Proto-Ñyqy” is the usual and most widely accepted spelling
of the name of the language and culture, but other spellings are
accepted such as “Proto Ñy Qy”, “Proto Ñy Ȟy”, “Proto My Qy”, or
“Proto My Ȟy”, each with their equivalent with one word only after the
“Proto” part. As we’ll see below in
§[[#Phonology-Consonants-crlb9nn0h5j0]], the actual pronunciation of
consonants is extremely uncertain, and each one of these orthographies
are based on one of the possible pronunciations of the term
{{{recon(ñyqy)}}}. In this book, we’ll use the so called “coronal-only”
orthography, unless mentionned otherwise. Some people also have the
very bad habit of dubbing this language and culture as simply “Ñyqy”
(or one of its variants), but this is very wrong, as the term “Ñyqy”
designates the whole familiy of languages and cultures that come from
the Proto-Ñyqy people. The Tiltinian languages are as much Tiltinian
as they are Ñyqy languages, but that does not mean they are the same
as the Proto-Ñyqy language, even if they are relatively close in terms
of time. When speaking about something that is “Ñyqy”, we are
generally speaking about daughter languages and cultures and not about
the Proto-Ñyqy language and culture itself.
Note also we usually write this language with groups of morphemes,
such as a noun group, as one word like we do with {{{recon(ñyqy)}}}.
However, when needed we might separate the morphemes by a dash, such
as in {{{recon(ñy-qy)}}}.
** Reconstructing the Culture Associated to the Language
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Introduction-On-the-culture-associated-to-the-language-oa3g5660e5j0
:END:
While the comparative method described in
§[[#Introduction-Principles-of-historical-linguistics-woq10x50e5j0]] work
on languages, we also have good reasons to believe they also work of
culture: if elements of different cultures that share a language from
the same family also share similar cultural elements, we have good
reasons to believe these elements were inherited from an earlier stage
of a common culture. This is an entire field of research in its own
right, of course, but linguistics also come in handy when trying to
figure out the culture of the Ñyqy people: the presence of certain
words can indicate the presence of what they meant, while the
impossibility of recreating a word at this stage of the language might
indicate it only appeared in later stages of its evolution, and it
only influenced parts of the decendents of the culture and language.
For instance, the lack of word for “honey” in Proto-Ñyqy but the
ability to reconstruct a separate word for both the northern and
southern branches strongly suggests both branches discovered honey
only after the Proto-Ñyqy language split up into different languages,
and its people in different groups, while the easy reconstruction of
{{{recon(mygú)}}} signifying /monkey/ strongly suggests both branches knew
about this animal well before these two groups split up. More on the
culture in §[[#Culture-of-the-Proto-Ñyqy-People-keflq2i0g5j0]] below.
* Culture of the Proto-Ñyqy People
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Culture-of-the-Proto-Ñyqy-People-keflq2i0g5j0
:END:
While the Proto-Ñyqy is the most well attested cultural and linguistic
family, the temporal distance between the Proto-Ñyqy people and us
makes it extremely hard to reconstruct anything. The various branches
of the Ñyqy family evolved over the past eight to twelve past
millenia, and some changed pretty drastically compared to their
ancestors. Therefore, do not expect an in-depth description of what
their society was like, but rather what could be considered an
overview compared to some other culture descriptions.
** The Name of the Language
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Culture-of-the-Proto-Ñyqy-People-The-Name-of-the-Language-cknak9n0h5j0
:END:
First, it is important to know where the name of this language came
from. Since it has such a wide spread in this world, giving it a name
based on where its daughter branches went would give it a very long
name, or with a shorter one we would have very boring or limited names
--- the “Proto-Northern-Southern” language doesn’t sound very good,
and the “Proto-Mojhal-Andelian” language leaves other major branches
out, such as the Pritian branch which we cannot ommit, just as the
Mojhal and Andelian branches. So, researchers went with the
reconstructed word for the inclusive /we/: {{{recon(ñyqy)}}}. It itself is a
coumpound word made up of {{{recon(ñy)}}}, which is the first person
pronoun, and {{{recon(qy)}}} which is sometimes used as a grammatical
morpheme indicating a plural --- it also means six, as we will later
on, the number system of the Proto-Ñyqy people was a bit complex.
** Geographical Location
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Culture-of-the-Proto-Ñyqy-People-Geographical-Location-fmfkumo0h5j0
:END:
It is often very hard to find the location of very old reconstructed
languages, such as the Proto-Mojhal language itself which location is
still not clearly known despite its name. But when it comes to the
Proto-Ñyqy people, we have a surprisingly good idea of where they
were: in the hot rainforests of the northern main continent, most
probably near nowadays’ Rhesodia. We know this thanks to some of their
reconstructed words which are typical for the other people that lived
or still live in hot rainforests, and these terms are older than the
split between the northern and southern groups. For instance, both
groups have a common ancestor word for /bongo/, {{{recon(zebac)}}}, as well as
for the /bonobo/, {{{recon(pawac)}}}, which are only found in these
rainforests.
** Society
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Culture-of-the-Proto-Ñyqy-People-Society-g29i52n0h5j0
:END:
** Religion and Beliefs
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Culture-of-the-Proto-Ñyqy-People-Religion-and-beliefs-31mj52n0h5j0
:END:
** Personal Names
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Culture-of-the-Proto-Ñyqy-People-Personal-names-8ymj52n0h5j0
:END:
* Phonology
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Phonology-imgb9nn0h5j0
:END:
** Vowels
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Phonology-Vowels-uvkb9nn0h5j0
:END:
** Consonants
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Phonology-Consonants-crlb9nn0h5j0
:END:
* Dictionary
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionary-y2icocp0h5j0
:END:
** B
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-B-ae79d268
:END:
** C
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-C-29dc766b
:END:
** E
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-E-54360434
:END:
** G
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-G-5a9af03c
:END:
** I
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-I-a81a4697
:END:
** J
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-J-88f57f6a
:END:
** M
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-M-cccfd958
:END:
** N
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-N-0ef6f2af
:END:
** Ñ
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-Ñ-ff7a574f
:END:
** O
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-O-cf8f0e3f
:END:
** Ø
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-8fcb6e1e
:END:
** Œ
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-Œ-0c780f53
:END:
** P
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-P-2b7ab301
:END:
- {{{recon(pawac)}}} :: {{{def}}}
1. (n) bonobo
** Q
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-Q-b1ec8323
:END:
** S
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-S-e9e187ae
:END:
** U
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-U-fa109e34
:END:
** Ú
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-Ú-c35e6434
:END:
** W
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-W-ea0cd36f
:END:
** Y
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-Y-a217cb68
:END:
** Z
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Dictionnaire-Z-144a2853
:END:
- {{{recon(zebac)}}} :: {{{def}}}
1. (n) bongo
* Private Data :noexport:
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Private-data-4kqa1530e5j0
:END:
#+name: glossary
| label | name | description |
|---------+---------+------------------------|
| conlang | conlang | A constructed language |
* Footnotes
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: Footnotes-uybi3030e5j0
:END:
[fn:3] [[https://phundrak.com][phundrak.com]]
[fn:2] [[https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/][creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/]]
[fn:1] [[https://langue.phundrak.com][langue.phundrak.com]]

1
content/headers
View File

@ -68,3 +68,4 @@
#+macro: end-largetable @@html:</div>@@
#+macro: def @@latex:\hfill@@
#+macro: defnl @@latex: \hfill\\@@
#+macro: recon *@@html:<i>$1</i>@@@@latex:\emph{$1}@@

3
content/headers.tex
View File

@ -11,4 +11,5 @@
\newunicodechar{’}{'}
\newunicodechar{…}{\ldots}
\newunicodechar{ }{~}
\newunicodechar{ }{~}
\newunicodechar{ }{~}
\usepackage{glossaries}