43 lines
1.7 KiB
Org Mode
43 lines
1.7 KiB
Org Mode
#+setupfile: ../headers
|
|
* Functional System :noexport:
|
|
** Grammatical Relationship
|
|
# Examplify some simple intransitive, transitive, and ditransitive
|
|
# clauses. Three-argument clauses may not unequivocally exist.
|
|
# - What are the grammatical erlations of this language? Give
|
|
# morphosyntactic evidence for each one that you propose.
|
|
# - Subject?
|
|
# - Ergative?
|
|
# - Absolutive?
|
|
# - Direct object?
|
|
# - Indirect object?
|
|
# There are basically four possible sources of evidence for
|
|
# grammatical relations:
|
|
# - morphological case on NPs
|
|
# - person marking on verbs
|
|
# - constituent ord
|
|
# - some pragmatic hierarchy
|
|
# - Is the system of grammatical relations in basic (affirmative,
|
|
# declarative) clauses organized according to a
|
|
# nominative/accusative, ergative/absolutive, tripartite, or some
|
|
# other system?
|
|
# - Is there a split system for organizing grammatical relations? If
|
|
# so, what determin
|
|
# - Is there split instransitivity? If so, what semantic or
|
|
# discourse/pragmatic factor conditions the split?
|
|
# - Does the system for pronouns and/or person marking on verbs
|
|
# operate on the same basis as that of full NPs?
|
|
# - Are there different grammatical-relation systems depending on
|
|
# the clause type (e.g. main vs. dependent clauses, affirmative
|
|
# vs. negative clauses)?
|
|
# - Are there different grammatical-relation assignment systems
|
|
# depending on th
|
|
# - Are there any syntactic processes (e.g. conjunction reduction,
|
|
# relativization) that operate on an ergative/absolutive basis?
|
|
** Constructions Link
|
|
** Valence Increase
|
|
*** Causative
|
|
*** Applicative
|
|
*** Dative Shift
|
|
*** Dative Interest
|
|
*** External Possession
|