#+setupfile: ../headers * Grammar ** Word Structure :noexport: ** Word Classes *** Nouns :noexport: # - What are the distributional properties of nouns? # - What are the structural properties of nouns? # - What are the major formally distinct subcategories of nouns? # - What is the basic structure of the noun word (for polysynthetic # languages) and/or noun phrases (for more isolating languages)? **** Countables and Uncountables :noexport: **** Proper Nouns :noexport: *** Pronouns and Anaphoric Clitics # - Does the language have free pronouns and/or anaphoric clitics? # (These are distinct from grammatical agreement.) # - Give a chart of the free pronouns and/or anaphoric clitics. **** Personal Pronouns | | 1s | 2s | 1p | 2s | |------------+-----+-----+-----+-----| | Nominative | ek | þú | vér | ér | | Accusative | mik | þik | oss | yðr | | Dative | mín | þín | vár | yðr | | Genitive | mér | þér | oss | yðr | #+begin_center First and second person pronouns in Eittlandic #+end_center The only notable change in written form from their Early Old Norse version is the regularization of the genitive plural second person /yðar/ into /yðr/. Otherwise, most changes only happened regarding their phonology as explained in [[file:./phonology.md#evolution-from-early-old-norse-to-eittlandic][the evolution from Early Old Norse to Eittlandic]]. | | Masculine | Feminine | Neuter | |---------------------+-----------+----------+--------| | Singular Nominative | hann | han | þat | | Singular Accusative | han | han | þat | | Singular Dative | hans | hennar | þass | | Singular Genitive | hanum | henn | því | |---------------------+-----------+----------+--------| | Plural Nominative | þeir | þér | þau | | Plural Accusative | þá | þér | þau | | Plural Dative | þeir | þeir | þeir | | Plural Genitive | þeim | þeim | þeim | #+begin_center Third person pronouns in Eittlandic #+end_center Here we also have few changes from the Early Old Norse pronouns for the third persons, singular and plural. **** Demonstrative Pronouns **** Possessive Pronouns Possessive pronouns in Eittlandic simply are the genitive form of the personal pronouns shown [[file:./grammar.md#personal-pronouns][above]]. The pronoun agrees with the owner in person and number, and in gender when the third person is used, as in English. They have two different usage. The first and more formal usage, inherited from Old Norse, is to precede the noun phrase owned by the owner with the genitive pronoun. For instance, /mín katt/ means /my cat/ while /þeim katt/ means /their cat/ (as shown in [[file:./grammar.md#case-marking][Case Marking]], we have no way to know if /katt/, a strong common word, is singular or plural accusative). The second and more casual way to express possession is using the definite form of a word and placing the possessive pronoun after it. We can adapt the previous examples of /my cat/ and /their cat/ as /kattin mín/ and /kattin þeim/. While these two forms provide a difference in tone, the second form is more limited as it only allows single word noun phrases to be the possessed element while the first allows more complex noun phrases. The sentence /mín kattrinn komand frá heim/ (/my cat coming from home/) would need to be modified in order to fit the second structure, such as /kattrinn mín, hvar komr frá heim/ (/my cat, who is coming from home/). *** Verbs # - What are the distributional properties of verbs? # - What are the structural properties of verbs? # - What are the major subclasses of verbs? # - Describe the order of various verbal operators within the verbal # - word or verb phrase. # - Give charts of the tense/aspect/mode, etc. Indicate major # allomorphic variants. # - Are directional and/or locational notions expressed in the verb or # - verb phrase at all? # - Is this operation obligatory, i.e. does one member of the # paradigm have to occur in every finite verb or verb phrase? # - Is it productiv # verb stems, and does it have the same meaning with each one? # (Nothing is fully productive, but some operations are more # productive than others.) # - Is this operation primarily coded morphologically, analytically, # or lexically? Are there any exceptions to the general case? # - Where in the verb phrase or verbal word is this operation likely # to appear? Can it occur in more than one place? Eittlandic, as most if not all North Germanic language, is a V2 language. This implies that in most cases, the verb in sentences will come at the second position, possibly moving its subject right between the verb itself and the rest of the verb phrase. The only exception to this are questions and the use of imperative. More on that later. Since Early Old Norse, Eittlandic evolved its verb both towards simplification on one hand, making the verb endings a lot more regular and predictable, and complexification with the addition of new moods and tenses. **** Verbal Structure :noexport: **** Verbal Derivations :noexport: **** Verbal Inflexions Verbs in Eittlandic agree with their subject in person and number, though it lost a lot of its diversity Old Norse had. It also varies depending on the tense, mood, and aspect of the verbal sentence. The examples are given using the verbs /far(a)/ (/to go/, a former strong verb), and /berja/ (/to beat/, a former weak verb). | | | | | | | person | | Indicative Present | Subjunctive Present | Indicative and Subjunctive Past | |--------+---+--------------------+---------------------+---------------------------------| | 1s | | -r | -ir | -t | | 2s | | -r | -ir | -t | | 3s | | -r | -ir | -t | | 1p | | -um | -im | -um | | 2p | | -ið | -ið | -uð | | 3p | | -ið | -ið | -uð | #+begin_center /Typical Verb Inflexion/ #+end_center | person | | far | berja | |--------+---+-------+--------| | 1s | | ferr | berjar | | 2s | | ferr | berjar | | 3s | | ferr | berjar | | 1p | | farum | berjum | | 2p | | farið | berið | | 3p | | farið | berið | #+begin_center Indicative present inflexion of /far(a)/ and /berja/ #+end_center Note that the final vowel of /berja/ gets replaced with the vowel from the inflexion, and the final /j/ also disappears when it is immediately followed by an /i/. Present subjunctive has similar declensions to present indicative. | person | | far | berja | |--------+---+-------+-------| | 1s | | ferir | berir | | 2s | | ferir | berir | | 3s | | ferir | berir | | 1p | | farim | berim | | 2p | | farið | berið | | 3p | | farið | berið | #+begin_center Subjunctive present inflexion of /far(a)/ and /berja/ #+end_center We can see again how the /ja/ at the end of infinitive /berja/ got replaced by the ending of subjunctive present verbs. The past declension is simpler as there is no difference between indicative and subjunctive past. | person | | far | berja | |--------+---+-------+--------| | 1s | | fert | berjat | | 2s | | fert | berjat | | 3s | | fert | berjat | | 1p | | farum | berjum | | 2p | | faruð | berjuð | | 3p | | faruð | berjuð | #+begin_center Indicative and subjunctive past inflexion of /far(a)/ and /berja/ #+end_center The infinitive and imperative merged due to the final vowel loss, making /far/ and /berja/ not only the infinitive form of /to go/ and /to beat/, but also their imperative form. Present and past participles are on the other hand made by appending /-and/ and /-it/ respectively. | infinitive / imperative | far | berja | | present participle | farand | berjand | | past participle | farit | berit | When it comes to the passive voice, inherited from the /-sk/ form in Old Norse, its declension is a lot more regular. However, we’ll see the remaining difference between strong and weak verbs. | | | | | | person | | Strong | Weak | |--------+---+----------+-------------| | 1s | | -umk | -umk | | 2s | | -(a/i)sk | -(ð/d/t)isk | | 3s | | -(a/i)sk | -(ð/d/t)isk | | 1p | | -umk | -umk | | 2p | | -(a/i)sk | -(ð/d/t)isk | | 3p | | -(a/i)sk | -(ð/d/t)isk | #+begin_center /Strong and Weak Verb Inflexion for the Indicative Present and Past in Passive Voice/ #+end_center | person | | far | berja | |--------+---+--------+-----------| | 1s | | ferumk | berjumk | | 2s | | ferisk | berjaðisk | | 3s | | ferisk | berjaðisk | | 1p | | farask | berjaðisk | | 2p | | farask | berjaðisk | | 3p | | farask | berjaðisk | There is only one minor difference for the subjunctive mood: both the first person singular and plural change to /-imk/ instead of /-umk/. Imperative, on the other hand, only works with the second person in the present tense by appending an /-sk/ at the end of the infinitive of the verb. Due to this uniformisation of the passive voice in Eittlandic, Eittlanders began using the verbs /ver(a)/ and /hav(a)/ (respectively /to be/ and /to have/) as auxilliaries preceeding the verb in order to convey the subject, tense, and mood agreement. The verb /ver(a)/ is most often used in active verbs, while the verb /hav(a)/ is generally used with stative verbs. While all verbs have a default auxilliary, such as /ver(a)/ for a verb like /et(a)/ (/to eat/), the speaker may choose to use the other auxilliary in order to increase or decrease the agency of the semantic agent (not the syntactic agent), even if it is not present in the sentence. #+html: ::: tip Example - Ek var brennumk mik | ek | var | brenn-umk | mik | | 1s.NOM | be.1s.IND.PST | burn-1s.PAS | 1s.ACC | /I burnt myself/ - Ek hav brennumk mik | ek | hav | brenn-umk | mik | | 1s.NOM | have.1s.IND.PST | burn-1s.PAS | 1s.ACC | /I got burnt/ #+html: ::: The verbs /var(a)/ and /hav(a)/ are irregular verbs that do not follow the same inflexion rules. For a list of their inflexion, see their dictionary entry ([[file:./dictionary.md#ver-a][ver(a)]] and [[file:./dictionary.md#hav-a][hav(a)]]). The passive voice inherits from the Old Norse mediopassive voice. It is often used to promote a semantic patient to a syntactic agent and to demote a semantic agent to a syntactic oblique, sometimes even completely removing it from the sentence. #+html: ::: tip Example - Maðrinn dragt fiskin frá vatnin | maðr-inn | drag-t | fisk-in | frá | vatn-in | | man.NOM-DEF.NOM | drag-IND.PST | fish-DEF.ACC | from | water-DEF.DAT | The man fished the fish from the water - Fiskinn var dragask frá vatnin | Fiskr-inn | var | drag-ask | frá | vatn-in | | fish.NOM-DEF.NOM | be.3s.IND.PST | drag-STG.PAS | from | water-DEF.DAT | The fish was fished from the water #+html: ::: *** Modifiers :noexport: # - If you posit a morphosyntactic category of adjectives, give # evidence for not grouping theseforms with the verbs or nouns. What # characterizes a form as being an adjective in this language? # - How can you characterize semantically the class of concepts coded # by this formal category? # - Do adjectives agr # noun class)? # - What kind of syst # - How high can a fluent native speaker count without resorting # either to words from another language or to a generic word like # /many/? Exemplify the system up to this point. # - Do numerals agree with their head nouns (number, case, noun # class, ...)? **** Descriptive Adjectives :noexport: **** Non-Numeral Quantifiers :noexport: **** Numerals :noexport: *** Adverbs :noexport: # - What characterikes a form as being an adverb in this language? If # you posit a distinct class of adverbs, argue for why these forms # should not be treated as nouns, verbs, or adjectives. # - For each kind of adverb listed in this section, list a few members # of the type, and specify whether there are any restrictions # relavite to that type, e.g. where they can come in a clause, any # morphemes common to the type, etc. # - Are any of these classes of adverbs related to older # complement-taking (matrix) verbs? *** Adpositions :noexport: *** Grammatical Particules :noexport: ** Constituants Order Typology *** Constituants Order in Main Clauses :noexport: # - What is the neutral order of free elements in the unit? # - Are there variations? # - How do the variant orders function? # - Specific to the main clause constituent order: What is the # pragmatically neutral order of constituents (A/S, P, and V) in # basic clauses of the language? *** Constituants Order in Nominal Clauses :noexport: # - Describe the order(s) of elements in the noun phrase. *** Constituants Order in Verbal Clauses :noexport: # - Where do auxliari # verb? # - Where do verb-phrase adverbs occur with respect to the verb and # auxiliaries? *** Adpositional Phrases :noexport: # - Is the language dominantly prepositional or post-positional? Give # examples. # - Do many adpositions come from nouns or verbs? *** Comparatives :noexport: # - Does the language have one or more grammaticalized comparative # constructions? If so, what is the order of the standard, the # marker and the quality by which an item is compared to the # standard? *** Questions # - In yes/no questions, if there is a question particle, where does # it occur? # - In information qu Questions in Eittlandic are formed by inverting the syntactic subject with its verb in a normal sentence. For example, the sentence /hann komr í dag með faðin hans/ (/he’s coming today with his father/) becomes a question when inverting /hann/ and /komr/. This is generally regarded as a formal way of forming questions. A more formal way of creating a question is by suffixing /-vit/ at the end of a verb without any change to the word order of the sentence. If there is any declension at the end of the verb, /-vit/ will bear it instead of the stem of the verb itself. It is somewhat similar to asking a question in English by simply raising the sentence’s tone. #+html: ::: tip Example - Hann komr í dag með faðin hans | hann | kom-r | í dag | með | fað-in | hans | | 3s.m.NOM | come-s.PRES.IND | today | with | father.ACC-DEF | 3s.m.GEN | He’s coming with his father today. - Komr han í dag með faðin hans? | kom-r | hann | í dag | með | fað-in | hans | | come-s.PRES.IND | 3s.m.NOM | today | with | father.ACC-DEF | 3s.m.GEN | Is he coming with his father today? - Han komvitr í dag með maðin hans? | hann | kom-vit-r | í dag | með | fað-in | hans | | 3s.m.NOM | come-Q-s.PRES.IND | today | with | father.ACC-DEF | 3s.m.GEN | He’s coming with his father today? #+html: ::: The verbs /ver(a)/ and /hav(a)/ both cannot use this construction. Instead, Eittlandic speakers may instead simply add /vit/ as a standalone word at the end of the question. #+html: ::: tip Example - Hann er konung. | hann | er | konung | | 3s.m.NOM | be.3s.PRES.IND | king.ACC | He is the king. - Er hann konung? | er | hann | konung | | be.3s.PRES.IND | 3s.m.NOM | king.ACC | Is he the king? - Hann er konung vit? | hann | er | konung | vit | | 3s.m.NOM | be.3s.PRES.IND | king | Q | He is the king? #+html: ::: This also applies to general questions as shown below, where the question word takes the place of either the syntactic patient or syntactic dative of the verb. #+html: ::: tip Example - Ná hvar ert þú? | ná | hvar | ert | þú | | now | where | be.2s.PRES.IND | 2s.NOM | Where are you now? - Ná þú ert hver vit? | ná | þú | ert | hvar | vit | | now | 2s.NOM | be.2s.PRES.IND | where | Q | You are where now? #+html: ::: **** Yes/No questions Yes/no questions are generally answered by /já/ or /nei/ (/yes/ or /no/ respectively), sometimes with a repeat of the core of the sentence to confirm the anwser. #+html: ::: tip Example - Komr han í dag með faðin hans? Is he coming today with his father? - Nei, han komr eig No, he’s not coming or - Já, han komr Yes, he’s coming #+html: ::: The interjections /já/ and /nei/ are often ambiguous when replying to a question employing a negative verb and are often avoided; Eittlanders will prefer to reply with part of or the entirety of the question with either a negative marker or not to confirm or deny the assumption of the question. #+html: ::: tip Example - Komr han eig í dag? Is he not coming today? - Han komr eig He’s not coming or - Han komr #+html: ::: Another strategy, a lot more common when replying to negative questions, is to reply using counter-factual interjection /eng/ meaning /yes/, while speakers will consider a simple /nei/ as an approbation of the assumption of the question. #+html: ::: tip Example - Komr han eig í dag? Is he not coming today? - Nei (han komr eig) No (he’s not coming) or - Áng (han komr) Yes he is coming #+html: ::: Similarly, when a question with a positive assumption is asked, Eittlandic speakers can answer with a counter-factual /náng/ to insist on its erroneous nature. #+html: ::: tip Example - Komr han eig í dag? Is he not coming today? - Náng (han komr eig) Of course not (he’s not coming) #+html: ::: Some yes/no questions are sometimes asked in a very reduced form, without a full verbal sentence and only consisting of a noun phrase. Think of questions like /Coffe?/ or /Another cookie?/ in English. Such questions in Eittlandic require the final word /vit/. #+html: ::: tip Example - Té ell kafé vit? Tea or coffe? - Té, þakk. Tea, please/thanks. #+html: ::: **** General questions General questions that are not yes/no questions will most of the time begin with a question word such as /hvar/ (/who/), the equivalent of WH words in English. ** Structure of a Nominal Group *** Composed Words :noexport: # - Is there noun-noun compounding that results in a noun (e.g. # /windshield/)? # - How do you know it is compounding? # - Is there noun-verb (or verb-noun) compounding that results in a # noun (e.g. /pickpocket/, /scarecrow/)? # - Are these process # can-opener)? How common is compounding? *** Denominalization :noexport: # - Are there any processes (productive or not) that form a verb from # a noun? # - An adjective from a noun? # - An adverb from a noun? *** Numbers :noexport: # - Is number express # - Is the distinction between singular and non-singular obligatory, # optional, or completely absent in the noun phrase? # - If number marking is “optional”, when does it tend to occur, and # when does it tend not to occur? # - If number marking is obligatory, is number overtly expressed for # all noun phrases or only some subclasses of noun phrases, such as # animate? # - What non-singular distinctions are there? *** Grammatical Case # - Do nouns exhibit morphological case? # - If so, what are the cases? (The functions of the cases will be # elaborated in lat **** Cases in Modern Eittlandic Although seldom visible, as described in [[file:./syntax.md#case-marking][Case Marking]], cases still remain part of the Eittlandic grammar, expressed through its syntax rather than explicit marking on its nouns and adjectives. Four different grammatical cases exist in this language: the *nominative*, *accusative*, *genitive*, and *dative* case. - The *nominative* case represents the subject of a sentence, that is, the subject of intransitive clauses and the agent of transitive clauses. As we’ll see below, it is morphologically marked only in dialects other than Standard Eittlandic, and only if the word is a strong masculine word. - On the other hand *accusative*, like Old Norse, usually marks the object of a verb, but it can also express time-related ideas such as a duration in time, or after some prepositions. It is also the default case when a noun has no clear status in a clause, and it can as such serve as a vocative. - *Dative* usually marks indirect objects of verbs in Old Norse, though it can also often mark direct objects depending on the verb used. **** Case Marking Although present in Early Old Norse, the use of grammatical cases has been on the decline since the Great Vowel Shift (see [[file:phonology.md#great-vowel-shift][Phonology: Great Vowel Shift]]). Due to the general loss of word-final short vowels and to regularization of its nouns, Eittlandic lost almost all of weak nouns’ inflexions and a good amount in its strong nouns’ inflexions. On top of this, the root of most nouns got regularized, getting rid of former umlauts. Hence, while in Old Norse one might find the table below presented in Cleasby and Vigfusson (1874), Modern Eittlandic is simplified to the table following it. #+name: tbl:old-norse-noun-inflexions #+caption: 1st declension of strong nouns and declensions of masculine weak nouns in Old Norse | / | | | | | | | | | Strong Masculine | Strong Feminine | Strong Neuter | Weak Masculine | |---+------------+------------------+-----------------+---------------+----------------| | | Sing. Nom. | heim-r | tíð | skip | tím-i | | | Acc. | heim | tíð | skip | tím-a | | | Dat. | heim-i | tíð | skip-i | tím-a | | | Gen. | heim-s | tíð-ar | skip-s | tím-a | | | Plur. Nom. | heim-ar | tíð-ir | skip | tím-ar | | | Acc. | heim-a | tíð-ir | skip | tím-a | | | Dat. | heim-um | tíð-um | skip-um | tím-um | | | Gen. | heim-a | tíð-a | skip-a | tím-a | #+name: tbl:eittlandic-example-noun-inflexions #+caption: Declensions for strong and weak nouns in Modern Eittlandic | / | | | | | | | | Strong Common | Strong Neuter | Weak Nouns | |---+------------+---------------+---------------+------------| | | Sing. Nom. | heim-r | skip | tím | | | Acc. | heim | skip | tím | | | Dat. | heim | skip | tím | | | Gen. | heim-ar | skip-s | tím-s | | | Plur. Nom. | heim-r | skip | tím-r | | | Acc. | heim | skip | tím | | | Dat. | heim-um | skip-um | tím-um | | | Gen. | heim-ar | skip-s | tím-s | As you can see, a good amount of declensions disappeared from nouns, with only four marked cases for strong common nouns and two for strong neuter and weak nouns. The declension system completely merged weak nouns which are no longer distinguished by gender. Strong masculine and strong feminine also got merged into strong common. Declensions are no longer productive in almost all Modern Eittlandic dialects. They are still mostly used in formal and written speech, but they are less and less used in less formal circumstances and in oral speech. The Royal Academy for Literature, which authored Standard Eittlandic, even recommends not using grammatical cases when using this dialect as they are reduntand with other syntactic strategies. While the recommendation is mostly followed, speakers still tend to use the singular genetive declension oraly. Younger folks at the time of writing even tend to regularize it as /-ar/ for strong neuter and weak nouns. One exception to declensions no longer being productive is in and around the Hylfjaltr Kingdom exclave in southern Eittland where speakers of its local dialect tend instead to favor strong nouns for newer terms. Hence, while most dialects agree on “internet” (pl.nom /internetr/, pl.dat /internetum/) being a weak noun, this dialect treats it as either a strong feminine (sg.gen /internetar/, pl.nom&acc /internetr/, pl.dat /internetum/) or a strong neuter (sg.gen /internets/, pl.dat /internetum/) --- the difference is due to subdivisions in said dialect, mainly between rural and urban areas favoring the former and the latter respectively. There are some regular exceptions to the declension system. The first one, inherited from Old Norse, is the /-r/ suffix becoming /-n/ or /-l/ when a noun ends with an «n» or an «l» respectively, hence the table below showing the declensions of strong masculine /himn/ (/heaven/) and strong feminine /hafn/ (/harbour/, /haven/). #+name: tbl:irregular-noun-declensions | | | | | | himn | hafn | |------------+--------+--------| | Sing. Nom. | himnn | hafnn | | Acc. | himn | hafn | | Gen. | himnar | hafnar | | Dat. | himn | hafn | | Plur. Nom. | himnn | hafnn | | Acc. | himn | hafn | | Gen. | himnar | hafnar | | Dat. | himnum | hafnum | During the last five centuries, the root of the word got regularized so that only one or two forms are allowed. Due to umlaut or ablaut, it is possible the main vowel of a word changes between its singular and plural form, even sometimes affecting its dative form. These changes are due to old vowels long gone since --- with most even gone by the time of Old Norse. These changes mainly remains in a few common words. The table below gives some examples of such irregularities. These words are marked as irregular in the dictionary. #+name: tbl:irregularities-root-nouns | | | | | | | | kettle (m.) | foot (m.) | book (f.) | water (n.) | |------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+------------| | Sing. Nom. | ketll | fótr | bók | vatn | | Gen. | ketl | fót | bók | vatn | | Acc. | ketlar | fótar | bókar | vatn | | Dat. | ketl | fót | bók | vatn | | Plur. Nom. | katll | fœtr | bœkr | vótnn | | Acc. | katl | fœt | bœkr | vótn | | Gen. | katl | fœt | bœk | vótn | | Dat. | katlum | fótum | bókum | vótnum | *** Articles and Demonstratives # - Do noun phrases have articles? # - If so, are they obligatory or optional, and under what # circumstances do they occur? # - Are they separate words, or bound morphemes? # - Is there a class of classes of demonstratives as distinct from # articles? # - How many degrees of distance are there in the system of # demontsratives? # - Are there other distinctions beside distances? When the noun of a nominal group is not a mass noun or a proper noun, an article must accompany it, except for indefinite plural nouns. **** Indefinite Article The indefinite article is /einn/, the same term as /one/ in Eittlandic. It agrees in declension with its noun, though it is to be noted its declension is irregular, as seen in table below. Similarly, other numerals have declensions as discussed in [[file:word-structure-and-classes.md#numerals][Word Classes: Numerals]]. #+name: tbl:declension-einn | | Masculine | Feminine | Neuter | |------+-----------+----------+--------| | Nom. | einn | ein | eit | | Acc. | ein | ein | eit | | Dat. | ein | einn | eits | | Gen. | einn | ein | eit | **** Definite articles As in other scandinavian languages, definite articles in Eittlandic act as suffixes to the noun and fully replace its declension as it has case marking itself. The full declension table of definite articles can be found in the table below. As we can see, the definite articles underwent an important regularization as well as merging strong neuter and weak nouns together. #+name: tbl:definite-articles | / | | | | | | | Strong Common | Strong Neuter and Weak Nouns | |---+------------+---------------+------------------------------| | | Sing. Nom. | -(i)nn | -(i)t | | | Acc. | -(i)n | -(i)t | | | Gen. | -(i)ns | -(i)ts | | | Dat. | -(i)n | -(i)t | | | Plur. Nom. | -(i)nn | -(i)tr | | | Acc. | -(i)n | -(i)t | | | Gen. | -(i)n | -(i)t | | | Dat. | -(i)num | -(i)tum | The initial /i/ is only used when using the definite articles as a suffix would cause a consonant cluster forbidden by Eittlandic phonology, otherwise it is omitted. An example of the former case is with /vatn/ (/water/) which becomes /vatnits/ when in its definite singular genitive form, while /øy/ (/island/) becomes /øyns/ in the same form. Like the indefinite article, the suffix agrees in gender, agreeing either with strong masculine or feminine words (or as established before, strong common) or with strong neuter and weak nouns. The use of definite articles with nouns is further discussed in [[file:./syntax.md#definiteness][Definiteness]]. *** Definiteness Definiteness in Eittlandic serves multiple purposes. Its most obvious one is to distinguish between an indefinite and a definite entity, as in English /a dog/ or /the dog/, respectively /einn hundr/ and /hundinn/, as discussed in [[file:./syntax.md#articles-and-demonstratives][Articles and Demonstratives]]. However, definiteness is also necessary with suffixed possessives and demonstrative. *** Possessives # - How are possessors expressed in the noun phrase? # - Do nouns agree with their possessors? Do possessors agree with # possessed nouns? Neither, or both? # - Is there a distinction between alienable and inalienable # possesson? # - Are there other types of possession? # - When the possessor is a full noun, where does it usually come with # respect to the possessed noun? *** Gender # - Is there a noun class system? # - What are the classes and how are they manifested in the noun # phrase? # - What dimension of reality is most central to the noun class system # (e.g. animacy, shape, function, etc.)? What other dimensions are # relevant? # - Do the classifiers occur with numerals? Adjectives? Verbs? # - What is their function in these contexts? Eittlandic inherited from Old Norse a gender system divided into three genders: male, female, and neuter. Although the number of elements marking it declined during its evolution, Eittlandic still marks gender in its strong nouns, adjectives, pronouns, and to a certain degree in its articles. However, as mentioned in [[file:./syntax.md#case-marking][Case Marking]], case marking and by extensions gender marking is slowly disappearing in Modern Eittlandic nouns and adjectives. Due to the presence of declensions with strong nouns and adjectives, its pronouns, and to a certain degree different articles, it can still be said Eittlandic is a gendered language, although it doesn’t hold much importance in its grammar anymore. Since strong nouns aren’t productive anymore and weak nouns lost all obvious gender differences, we can even consider gender as not productive anymore in Eittlandic and bound to eventually disappear. In fact, the loss of gender is even stronger in Standard Eittlandic due to the theoretical absence of declensions in this dialect. In case a strong noun is used with a strong adjective, both will agree in number and gender. #+html: ::: tip Example - hvítr hund | white.m.sg.acc | dog.m.sg.acc | white dog - langir tungir | long.f.pl.acc | tongues.f.pl.acc | long tongues #+html: ::: *** Diminution and Augmentation :noexport: # - Does the language employ diminutive and/or augmentative operators # in the noun or noun phrase? # - Questions to answ # - Is this operation obligatory, i.e. does one member of the # paradigm have to occur in every full noun phrase? # - Is it productiv # full noun phras # one? (Nothing is fully productive, but some operations are more # so than others.) # - Is this operation primarily expressed lexically, # morphologically, or analytically? # - Where in the noun phrase is this operation likely to be located? # - Can it occur in more than one place? ** Predicates and Linked Constructions :noexport: *** Nominal Predicates # - How are proper inclusion and equative predicates formed? # - What restrictions are there, if any, on the TAM marking of such # clauses? *** Adjective Predicates # - How are predicate adjective formed? (Include a separate section on # predicate adjectives only if they are structurally distinct from # predicate nominals.) *** Locative Predicat # - How are locational clauses (or predicate locatives) formed? *** Existential Predicates # - How are existential clauses formed? (Give examples in different # tense/aspects, especially if there is significant variation.) # - How are negative # - Are there extended uses of existential morphology? (Provide # pointers to other relevant sections of the grammar.) *** Possessive Clauses # - How are possessiv ** Verbal Groups Structure :noexport: ** Intransitive Clauses :noexport: ** Ditransitive Clauses :noexport: ** Dependent Type Clauses :noexport: *** Non-Finite *** Semi-Finite *** Finite ** Grammatical Relationship :noexport: # Examplify some simple intransitive, transitive, and ditransitive # clauses. Three-argument clauses may not unequivocally exist. # - What are the grammatical erlations of this language? Give # morphosyntactic evidence for each one that you propose. # - Subject? # - Ergative? # - Absolutive? # - Direct object? # - Indirect object? # There are basically four possible sources of evidence for # grammatical relations: # - morphological case on NPs # - person marking on verbs # - constituent ord # - some pragmatic hierarchy # - Is the system of grammatical relations in basic (affirmative, # declarative) clauses organized according to a # nominative/accusative, ergative/absolutive, tripartite, or some # other system? # - Is there a split system for organizing grammatical relations? If # so, what determin # - Is there split instransitivity? If so, what semantic or # discourse/pragmatic factor conditions the split? # - Does the system for pronouns and/or person marking on verbs # operate on the same basis as that of full NPs? # - Are there different grammatical-relation systems depending on # the clause type (e.g. main vs. dependent clauses, affirmative # vs. negative clauses)? # - Are there different grammatical-relation assignment systems # depending on th # - Are there any syntactic processes (e.g. conjunction reduction, # relativization) that operate on an ergative/absolutive basis? ** Constructions Link :noexport: ** Valence Increase :noexport: *** Causative *** Applicative *** Dative Shift *** Dative Interest *** External Possession