docs(eittlandic): merge syntax and functional system into grammar
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ff36c0af6
commit
46e2b210c4
@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ export default defineUserConfig({
|
|||||||
link: '/eittlandic/phonology',
|
link: '/eittlandic/phonology',
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
text: 'Syntax',
|
text: 'Grammar',
|
||||||
link: '/eittlandic/syntax',
|
link: '/eittlandic/grammar',
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
text: 'Dictionary',
|
text: 'Dictionary',
|
||||||
|
@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
#+setupfile: ../headers
|
|
||||||
* Functional System :noexport:
|
|
||||||
** Grammatical Relationship
|
|
||||||
# Examplify some simple intransitive, transitive, and ditransitive
|
|
||||||
# clauses. Three-argument clauses may not unequivocally exist.
|
|
||||||
# - What are the grammatical erlations of this language? Give
|
|
||||||
# morphosyntactic evidence for each one that you propose.
|
|
||||||
# - Subject?
|
|
||||||
# - Ergative?
|
|
||||||
# - Absolutive?
|
|
||||||
# - Direct object?
|
|
||||||
# - Indirect object?
|
|
||||||
# There are basically four possible sources of evidence for
|
|
||||||
# grammatical relations:
|
|
||||||
# - morphological case on NPs
|
|
||||||
# - person marking on verbs
|
|
||||||
# - constituent ord
|
|
||||||
# - some pragmatic hierarchy
|
|
||||||
# - Is the system of grammatical relations in basic (affirmative,
|
|
||||||
# declarative) clauses organized according to a
|
|
||||||
# nominative/accusative, ergative/absolutive, tripartite, or some
|
|
||||||
# other system?
|
|
||||||
# - Is there a split system for organizing grammatical relations? If
|
|
||||||
# so, what determin
|
|
||||||
# - Is there split instransitivity? If so, what semantic or
|
|
||||||
# discourse/pragmatic factor conditions the split?
|
|
||||||
# - Does the system for pronouns and/or person marking on verbs
|
|
||||||
# operate on the same basis as that of full NPs?
|
|
||||||
# - Are there different grammatical-relation systems depending on
|
|
||||||
# the clause type (e.g. main vs. dependent clauses, affirmative
|
|
||||||
# vs. negative clauses)?
|
|
||||||
# - Are there different grammatical-relation assignment systems
|
|
||||||
# depending on th
|
|
||||||
# - Are there any syntactic processes (e.g. conjunction reduction,
|
|
||||||
# relativization) that operate on an ergative/absolutive basis?
|
|
||||||
** Constructions Link
|
|
||||||
** Valence Increase
|
|
||||||
*** Causative
|
|
||||||
*** Applicative
|
|
||||||
*** Dative Shift
|
|
||||||
*** Dative Interest
|
|
||||||
*** External Possession
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||||||
#+setupfile: ../headers
|
#+setupfile: ../headers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Syntax
|
* Grammar
|
||||||
** Word Structure :noexport:
|
** Word Structure :noexport:
|
||||||
** Word Classes
|
** Word Classes
|
||||||
*** Nouns :noexport:
|
*** Nouns :noexport:
|
||||||
@ -413,3 +413,43 @@ in number and gender.
|
|||||||
*** Non-Finite
|
*** Non-Finite
|
||||||
*** Semi-Finite
|
*** Semi-Finite
|
||||||
*** Finite
|
*** Finite
|
||||||
|
** Grammatical Relationship :noexport:
|
||||||
|
# Examplify some simple intransitive, transitive, and ditransitive
|
||||||
|
# clauses. Three-argument clauses may not unequivocally exist.
|
||||||
|
# - What are the grammatical erlations of this language? Give
|
||||||
|
# morphosyntactic evidence for each one that you propose.
|
||||||
|
# - Subject?
|
||||||
|
# - Ergative?
|
||||||
|
# - Absolutive?
|
||||||
|
# - Direct object?
|
||||||
|
# - Indirect object?
|
||||||
|
# There are basically four possible sources of evidence for
|
||||||
|
# grammatical relations:
|
||||||
|
# - morphological case on NPs
|
||||||
|
# - person marking on verbs
|
||||||
|
# - constituent ord
|
||||||
|
# - some pragmatic hierarchy
|
||||||
|
# - Is the system of grammatical relations in basic (affirmative,
|
||||||
|
# declarative) clauses organized according to a
|
||||||
|
# nominative/accusative, ergative/absolutive, tripartite, or some
|
||||||
|
# other system?
|
||||||
|
# - Is there a split system for organizing grammatical relations? If
|
||||||
|
# so, what determin
|
||||||
|
# - Is there split instransitivity? If so, what semantic or
|
||||||
|
# discourse/pragmatic factor conditions the split?
|
||||||
|
# - Does the system for pronouns and/or person marking on verbs
|
||||||
|
# operate on the same basis as that of full NPs?
|
||||||
|
# - Are there different grammatical-relation systems depending on
|
||||||
|
# the clause type (e.g. main vs. dependent clauses, affirmative
|
||||||
|
# vs. negative clauses)?
|
||||||
|
# - Are there different grammatical-relation assignment systems
|
||||||
|
# depending on th
|
||||||
|
# - Are there any syntactic processes (e.g. conjunction reduction,
|
||||||
|
# relativization) that operate on an ergative/absolutive basis?
|
||||||
|
** Constructions Link :noexport:
|
||||||
|
** Valence Increase :noexport:
|
||||||
|
*** Causative
|
||||||
|
*** Applicative
|
||||||
|
*** Dative Shift
|
||||||
|
*** Dative Interest
|
||||||
|
*** External Possession
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user