docs(eittlandic): merge syntax and functional system into grammar
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ff36c0af6
commit
46e2b210c4
@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ export default defineUserConfig({
|
||||
link: '/eittlandic/phonology',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
text: 'Syntax',
|
||||
link: '/eittlandic/syntax',
|
||||
text: 'Grammar',
|
||||
link: '/eittlandic/grammar',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
text: 'Dictionary',
|
||||
|
@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#+setupfile: ../headers
|
||||
* Functional System :noexport:
|
||||
** Grammatical Relationship
|
||||
# Examplify some simple intransitive, transitive, and ditransitive
|
||||
# clauses. Three-argument clauses may not unequivocally exist.
|
||||
# - What are the grammatical erlations of this language? Give
|
||||
# morphosyntactic evidence for each one that you propose.
|
||||
# - Subject?
|
||||
# - Ergative?
|
||||
# - Absolutive?
|
||||
# - Direct object?
|
||||
# - Indirect object?
|
||||
# There are basically four possible sources of evidence for
|
||||
# grammatical relations:
|
||||
# - morphological case on NPs
|
||||
# - person marking on verbs
|
||||
# - constituent ord
|
||||
# - some pragmatic hierarchy
|
||||
# - Is the system of grammatical relations in basic (affirmative,
|
||||
# declarative) clauses organized according to a
|
||||
# nominative/accusative, ergative/absolutive, tripartite, or some
|
||||
# other system?
|
||||
# - Is there a split system for organizing grammatical relations? If
|
||||
# so, what determin
|
||||
# - Is there split instransitivity? If so, what semantic or
|
||||
# discourse/pragmatic factor conditions the split?
|
||||
# - Does the system for pronouns and/or person marking on verbs
|
||||
# operate on the same basis as that of full NPs?
|
||||
# - Are there different grammatical-relation systems depending on
|
||||
# the clause type (e.g. main vs. dependent clauses, affirmative
|
||||
# vs. negative clauses)?
|
||||
# - Are there different grammatical-relation assignment systems
|
||||
# depending on th
|
||||
# - Are there any syntactic processes (e.g. conjunction reduction,
|
||||
# relativization) that operate on an ergative/absolutive basis?
|
||||
** Constructions Link
|
||||
** Valence Increase
|
||||
*** Causative
|
||||
*** Applicative
|
||||
*** Dative Shift
|
||||
*** Dative Interest
|
||||
*** External Possession
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
#+setupfile: ../headers
|
||||
|
||||
* Syntax
|
||||
* Grammar
|
||||
** Word Structure :noexport:
|
||||
** Word Classes
|
||||
*** Nouns :noexport:
|
||||
@ -413,3 +413,43 @@ in number and gender.
|
||||
*** Non-Finite
|
||||
*** Semi-Finite
|
||||
*** Finite
|
||||
** Grammatical Relationship :noexport:
|
||||
# Examplify some simple intransitive, transitive, and ditransitive
|
||||
# clauses. Three-argument clauses may not unequivocally exist.
|
||||
# - What are the grammatical erlations of this language? Give
|
||||
# morphosyntactic evidence for each one that you propose.
|
||||
# - Subject?
|
||||
# - Ergative?
|
||||
# - Absolutive?
|
||||
# - Direct object?
|
||||
# - Indirect object?
|
||||
# There are basically four possible sources of evidence for
|
||||
# grammatical relations:
|
||||
# - morphological case on NPs
|
||||
# - person marking on verbs
|
||||
# - constituent ord
|
||||
# - some pragmatic hierarchy
|
||||
# - Is the system of grammatical relations in basic (affirmative,
|
||||
# declarative) clauses organized according to a
|
||||
# nominative/accusative, ergative/absolutive, tripartite, or some
|
||||
# other system?
|
||||
# - Is there a split system for organizing grammatical relations? If
|
||||
# so, what determin
|
||||
# - Is there split instransitivity? If so, what semantic or
|
||||
# discourse/pragmatic factor conditions the split?
|
||||
# - Does the system for pronouns and/or person marking on verbs
|
||||
# operate on the same basis as that of full NPs?
|
||||
# - Are there different grammatical-relation systems depending on
|
||||
# the clause type (e.g. main vs. dependent clauses, affirmative
|
||||
# vs. negative clauses)?
|
||||
# - Are there different grammatical-relation assignment systems
|
||||
# depending on th
|
||||
# - Are there any syntactic processes (e.g. conjunction reduction,
|
||||
# relativization) that operate on an ergative/absolutive basis?
|
||||
** Constructions Link :noexport:
|
||||
** Valence Increase :noexport:
|
||||
*** Causative
|
||||
*** Applicative
|
||||
*** Dative Shift
|
||||
*** Dative Interest
|
||||
*** External Possession
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user